[I attempted to get this viewpoint published in three newspapers in Michigan without success. So I am putting it out there via the blogosphere. Share as you see fit].
Recent Michigan legislation introduced to eliminate the state income tax therefore suggests the end of our so-called democracy. We have been accelerating our race towards oligarchy in recent years with the deleterious Citizen’s United case that makes it easier for the wealthy to purchase elections, the recent election handing the 0.1% the reins of government, and the avalanche of mergers and acquisitions that concentrate more wealth and power in fewer and fewer hands.
Taxes are the dues we pay to live in a civilized, democratic
society.
Recent Michigan legislation introduced to eliminate the state income tax therefore suggests the end of our so-called democracy. We have been accelerating our race towards oligarchy in recent years with the deleterious Citizen’s United case that makes it easier for the wealthy to purchase elections, the recent election handing the 0.1% the reins of government, and the avalanche of mergers and acquisitions that concentrate more wealth and power in fewer and fewer hands.
Who accrues the most from the elimination of income tax? No
surprise, it’s the wealthiest among us. And when government is totally starved,
who will repair all the market failures and pay for externalities like pollution
that aren’t in the private sector’s balance sheets? The extreme wealthy already
own our government via fossil fuels, banking, the military-industrial-complex
and pharmaceutical conglomerates, with their minions at the top. A functioning
democracy would wrestle some of the power back to the citizens. Voting isn’t
enough. Citizens need to pressure government to do the right thing. Democracy is not a spectator sport.
Here’s an example: The poisoning of the Tittibiwassee River
from dioxins was largely the work of Dow Chemical upstream in Midland. Once the
problem was identified, largely with the help of concerned citizens who live in
the watershed, Dow was approached by the DEQ and EPA to fix it. But Dow, now
merging with Dupont after swallowing Union Carbide following that firm’s deadly
example of citizenship in Bhopal, India, sought delay after delay. The cost of
cleanup was substantial, hence their reluctance to finance the repair, a
similar story only magnified in Bhopal .
But much of the Dow largess is tucked away in Dow Family foundations,
which bequeath some small portion each year to beautify Midland and support
other community causes; the benefactors are then showered with adulation from
those who benefit from the crumbs from their table.'
When I sat for a brief stint on an environmental advisory
panel that looked at that issue more than a decade ago, I noted that tapping
some of the Dow Foundation money could easily cover the cost of cleaning up the
Tittibiwassee mess. Of course, such a radical suggestion was quickly ignored
and the foundations, who weren’t at the table, weren’t offering.
There is something magical about great wealth. We tend to be
enamored of it, perhaps imagining ourselves living in palatial surroundings,
totally unconcerned about expenditures. Those who argue that the wealthiest
among us pay the most in taxes (in real dollars) always neglect a fundamental reality:
it’s not how much one pays but how much one has left that really matters.
The median household income in the US is roughly
$50,000. Current Michigan tax (4.25%) on
that amount is $2,125, leaving $47,875. To be in the semi-lofty 1% category you
need to make a minimum of $429,000, in which case your tax would be $19,072,
leaving you a meager $409,928 to scrape by. But this is one year only. If those
incomes stay steady for even ten years the one-percenters earn $4,290,000 and
pay democracy dues of $190,725, leaving them with $4,099,275 compared with our
median family which has earned $478,750. The difference, then, between the two
families’ wealth has grown from $362,053 to $3,620,500.
This is the disease
that is spreading rapidly here and abroad. It is now among the highest risk
concerns as identified by the World Economic Forum in their recent 2017 Global Risks Report. Our state legislators are oblivious.
We shouldn’t be.
No comments:
Post a Comment