Showing posts with label justice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label justice. Show all posts

Friday, November 22, 2024

Living With Boundaries

 I attempted to give a public talk last week which was intended to find some coherence with many of the issues and forces cascading through our present world. I was completely pleased with my delivery, but the elements I wanted to touch on are there for anyone interested.

 


It was perhaps with some irony that at roughly the same day I was sharing my thoughts, Dr. Johan Rockstrom, the leader of the emerging "Planetary Boundaries" science was giving a terrific and essential talk (only 20 minutes) to a huge gathering of young people somewhere in Europe. 

Perhaps, the rapidity of reports will be the new norm as we take a look at these new graphs compiled by The Guardian and published just this week. 

There is plenty of evidence that climate and other planetary boundaries should be our primary concern as these reports make clear. But as I have argued in the past regarding the broader concerns of the 17 Global Sustainable Development Goals, my talk tried to not only link them (no pun intended), but to offer an attitude and approach to meet that significant challenge.

Now, with an incoming administration that has either absolutely no understanding of planetary boundaries, or just doesn't care, we are marching directly towards the abyss. Fortunately, there are many millions who do understand the polycrisis we face. How to resist the worst actions that will emanate from this autocratic and oligarchical gang is still unclear to me. But we must.

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Could Sanity Prevail?

 

I heard a report on NPR the other day where former EPA administrator Gina McCarthy offered that, in our culture, you don’t get people to change behavior by asking them to sacrifice but rather by convincing them that the change is good for them. I guess on the face of it that sounds practical. But there is a throbbing force within me that challenges that notion.

It would seem to me that by employing that strategy one reinforces the self-centeredness that is, at its base, the scourge of our time.

This “me” focus is accentuated in the gross growth of income by celebrities and others. The highlight recently was Elon Musk’s annual salary of $46 BILLION. But we can also look to Taylor Swift’s almost $2 BILLION for 2023, or the 5-year contract for $275 MILLION recently signed by football star Trevor Lawrence. See more in a recent NYT piece on sports salaries following the Caitlyn Clark signing. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5491137/2024/05/16/caitlin-clark-wnba-salary-comparison/

How much is enough, with 8 billion people living on a single planet under stress, largely because of the appetites for more? August 1 this year is expected to designate Overshoot Day. Earth Overshoot Day is computed by dividing the planet’s biocapacity (the amount of ecological resources Earth is able to generate that year) by humanity’s Ecological Footprint (humanity’s demand for that year) and multiplying by 365, the number of days in a year.

What does it tell us about ourselves that our culture keeps urging us to consume more, to get the newest, fastest, biggest thing; that constant advertising entices us to be unsatisfied with what we have and that to be truly fulfilled we need more, bigger, better?

The median household income for Michigan in 2023 was $64,488. That’s for a family of four. The super rich, such as those mentioned above, make a lot more money than their annual salaries, as they have investment income that is taxed at much lower rates than median workers’ income. This is a driver of national debt, because it shrinks government revenue while benefiting the already wealthy. It’s also why we can’t seem to afford to pay teachers more, provide health care for all, or seriously invest in addressing climate destabilization.

In 2002, Robley George wrote a little reviewed or read book, Socio-Economic Democracy: An Advanced Socioeconomic System.

 

 

  While the title may seem a little heavy, its message was really straightforward: Why don’t we have a system that democratically determines what a minimum livable income should be as well as a maximum allowable wealth? He elaborates on these issues over some 200 pages with uncanny insights. The kicker is how to balance these extremes democratically, which he does nicely. It would be fascinating to have local communities vote their preferences and see where they set those limits!! I suspect you would see a significantly reduced gulf between the top and bottom, perhaps akin to studies that show people’s perception of wealth gaps and the reality. Check this out

Serendipity intervenes. Just noticed after I drafted this that a new book has come out by economist Peter Victor, Escape from Overshoot: Economics for a Planet in Peril

 

 

I got my fingers on a copy and read the forward, prologue, intro and first chapter this morning. You can read the prologue and first chapter here. It is an incredibly lucid text with tons of graphics to help make the points. The prepub accolades are numerous and impressive-

Uses sound economics to map a path out of overshoot. Highly recommended.
―Herman Daly

An excellent primer on key insights and questions in ecological economics from a celebrated pioneer of the field.
―Jason Hickel, author, Less is More

Peter Victor provides a state-of-the-art overview of the drawings for the economic rocket humanity needs for a safe landing on Spaceship Earth. In our turbulent times, with multiple planetary boundaries breached and tipping points approaching fast, Escape from Overshoot provides the perfect launch pad for new economic thinking that reconnects the world with planet Earth.
―Johan Rockström, Professor, Earth System Science; Director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research; and co-author, Earth for All

The title of Peter Victor's important book says it all: the planet is in peril and a major factor is a global economy too big for nature to flourish. Human beings are animals and thus, like all other species, constrained by nature and nature's laws. An economy unfettered by the needs and limits of nature and propelled by a fool's goal of endless growth has created the twin ecological crises of climate change and biodiversity loss. All who care about the kind of world we are leaving to our grandchildren and what we can do to bring the economy into harmony with nature must read this vital book.
―David Suzuki, emeritus professor and grandfather

No one pulls it all together as well as Peter Victor. His Escape from Overshoot covers climate and other key issues with a compelling clarity. I highly recommend this book.
―James Gustave Speth, former Dean, Yale School of the Environment, and author, America the Possible

Victor draws a plausible pathway that nicely intertwines with a growing body of evidence and proposals for new economic models from across the globe. This book is timely and gives cause for hope!
―Sandrine Dixson-Declève, co-president, the Club of Rome, and co-author, Earth for All

Erudite and lavishly illustrated, Peter Victor's Escape from Overshoot is a sweeping analysis of the flawed economic mindset that has pushed us to the brink and an inspired prescription for the new economics needed to help pull us back.
―William Rees, professor emeritus, University of British Columbia, former director of the School of Community and Regional Planning (SCARP), and co-author, Our Ecological Footprint

I own hundreds of books, all carefully curated. But I reserve one short shelf for books that I think everybody needs to read right away in order to grasp the human condition and what needs to be done. Peter Victor's Escape from Overshoot is now at the front of that shelf. It is clearly and entertainingly written and elicits an aha! on every page. Escape from Overshoot would be a great book on those merits alone, even if it weren't the key to our collective fate.
―Richard Heinberg, Senior Fellow, Post Carbon Institute, and author, Power

An absolute must read― I could not put it down and read it in one sitting. Peter Victor masterfully ties the threads of economic thought together to demonstrate why― and how― we can collectively do our best to avoid climate and ecological breakdown.
―David Miller, managing director, C40 Centre for City Climate Policy and Economy

Escape from Overshoot is a tour de force of the latest research in ecological economics from one of the top researchers in the field. In a highly accessible style, with a helpful figure or illustration on almost every page, Peter Victor explains how the current economic system works, how it has pushed us to the precipice of environmental collapse, and how a post-growth economy could pull us back from the edge.
―Dan O'Neill, Associate Professor in Ecological Economics, University of Leeds, and president, European Society for Ecological Economics

If you want to enable the next generation to build a successful future, ditch the textbooks from the past and get this one instead.
―Mathis Wackernagel, Ph.D., founder and president, Global Footprint Network, and author, Ecological Footprint

I urge you to read it and think about how to live the rest of our remaining lives….

Saturday, March 28, 2020

Where Are We Headed?







This brief article “Tackle climate crisis and poverty with zeal of Covid-19 fight, scientists urge"  in today's Guardian is prescient and important I believe. It’s not the only or unique piece I’ve read with a similar perspective, but it illuminates that we are in a key opportunity moment. If we honestly believe that returning to business as usual once the current pandemic is past us is the way to go, then we will almost certainly continue on a path with increasing and accelerating challenges that will overwhelm our ability to survive them. If we feel a change is necessary then of course we need to come to some agreement, not just within the U.S., but globally, on what principles should drive our collective decision-making. 

What it comes down to, or what I think the vast majority of we humans want, is a "Good Society". Now where we differ is how we might define what a 'Good Society' looks like. In my last blog, already more than five months back I had written about sociologist Erik Olin Wright's last book before he succumbed to cancer, wherein he lays out four theses as summarized succinctly in the afterword written by Michael Burawoy. “First, another world is possible; second, it could improve conditions of human flourishing for most people; third, elements of this world are already being created; and finally, there are ways to move from here to there.” (p. 154) 

Wright directs us throughout the work to consider three essential cluster of values in both critiquing capitalism and in forming alternatives – 

Equality/Fairness
Democracy/Freedom
Community/Solidarity


In this new offering, Dumas despite his long tenure as an economist who can crunch numbers with the best of them, manages to open economics up beyond a plethora of numbers and graphs to the underlying purpose of an economy - to build a good society. While I’m not quite finished with the book, it is clear that Dumas believes that freedom, democracy, and personal development, and preserving the web of life are at the heart of what a good society must be built on. I found some of his more insightful passages around the notion of meaningful work, the role of attitude, meritocracy, and authority. 

The tone of the volume like that of the late Dr. Wright, is one of honest reflection, not didactic nor arrogant, but almost as if offering a gift. While I haven't completed the book yet, I see that he concludes by condensing his argument into six fundamental principles. These principles and idea align not only with the late Dr. Wright’s but they are alive and well and at the center of the work of a number of organizations here and abroad.

Democracy Collaborative                                  
Post Carbon Institute                                         
Transition Network                                             
Next System Project                                           

We already have a globally agreed upon approach to what a good society should look like with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. These 17 goals, 169 targets and 240 indicators that every member nation of the United Nations agreed to in 2015, will move us much closer to building that society, not just here in the U.S., but around the globe. That most of the American public is ignorant of this agreement, and that only a few institutions, businesses and communities are focusing on realizing them, does not mean they should be abandoned. Rather it's time to make them all of our work.

As the late songwriter, Phil Och's implored, these are Days of Decision.

We might also revisit and absorb the Declaration of Interdependence that the David Suzuki Foundation offered almost 30 years ago. The pandemic has made this all the more clear.

This we know

We are the earth, through the plants and animals that nourish us.
We are the rains and the oceans that flow through our veins.
We are the breath of the forests of the land, and the plants of the sea.
We are human animals, related to all other life as descendants of the firstborn cell.
We share with these kin a common history, written in our genes.
We share a common present, filled with uncertainty.
And we share a common future, as yet untold.
We humans are but one of thirty million species weaving the thin layer of life enveloping the world.
The stability of communities of living things depends upon this diversity.
Linked in that web, we are interconnected — using, cleansing, sharing and replenishing the fundamental elements of life.
Our home, planet Earth, is finite; all life shares its resources and the energy from the sun, and therefore has limits to growth.
For the first time, we have touched those limits.
When we compromise the air, the water, the soil and the variety of life, we steal from the endless future to serve the fleeting present.

This we believe




Humans have become so numerous and our tools so powerful that we have driven fellow creatures to extinction, dammed the great rivers, torn down ancient forests, poisoned the earth, rain and wind, and ripped holes in the sky.
Our science has brought pain as well as joy; our comfort is paid for by the suffering of millions.
We are learning from our mistakes, we are mourning our vanished kin, and we now build a new politics of hope.
We respect and uphold the absolute need for clean air, water and soil.
We see that economic activities that benefit the few while shrinking the inheritance of many are wrong.
And since environmental degradation erodes biological capital forever, full ecological and social cost must enter all equations of development.
We are one brief generation in the long march of time; the future is not ours to erase.
So where knowledge is limited, we will remember all those who will walk after us, and err on the side of caution.

This we resolve

All this that we know and believe must now become the foundation of the way we live.
At this turning point in our relationship with Earth, we work for an evolution: from dominance to partnership; from fragmentation to connection; from insecurity, to interdependence.